Supreme Court Voted 5-4 to back lower court injunctions
Federal DOE can’t enforce unlawful rules on those included in lower court injunctions. (Link below to find if your school is included in the injunctions)
University of Wisconsin acknowledging injunction
Find if your School is a part of the Mom’s for Liberty Injuction
Sample Board Message
Ask the board to stand against the unlawful rule changes. Click for sample message
Why are the Title IX Revisions Unlawful?
The intent of the 1972 law was to provide opportunity for women/girls where federal funds are distributed. It all comes down to intent, administrative rules can’t contradict the original intent of the law (without congress). The 1,500 pages is an attack on our women/girls, making the administrative rules unlawful. Supreme court overturning the ‘chevron doctrine’ strengthens the argument (ruling occurred a few weeks ago). On top of that this rule making was done by executive order and that makes this change temporary in nature. Also unlawful was the use of executive order to change the definition of “sex”, the whole bases of Title IX was based of “sex” = male or female.
NO PRECEDENT TO HOLD FUNDING AND MORE.
Presented by Dr. Kelly Kohls, NSBLC and guest speaker Sarah Parshall Perry-
Sarah is former senior counsel to assistant secretary on civil rights at the US DOE. Currently senior Legal Fellow with The Heritage Foundation In previous roles she focused on constitutional law and civial rights law. NSBLC = National School Board Leadership Council.